Former postman sentenced after six sacks of undelivered mail discovered out the back of his house
Pressure built up on a postman who was overwhelmed by the volume of post he was required to deliver and he began to accumulate sacks of undelivered mail at the back of his home. Picture Denis Minihane.
Pressure built up on a postman who was overwhelmed by the volume of post he was required to deliver and he began to accumulate sacks of undelivered mail at the back of his home.
That was the scenario described at Cork District Court where Stephen Hegarty pleaded guilty to the single charge of failing to deliver post on June 11 2021.
Judge Joanne Carroll said:
Frank Buttimer solicitor said on behalf of the young man – who has since lost his job as a postman – “Much of the material was unsolicited or junk mail. And it built up over a period of four to six months.
“What he should have done was discuss the increased volume with his line manager. The mail also included ordinary, regular post, in with the junk mail. Instead of raising it with his employer he kept it to himself.
“His employer discovered something was amiss – probably due to people contacting An Post to say they had expected certain post but had not received it.
Judge Carroll imposed a two-month sentence on the accused but suspended it on condition that he would attend for treatment for his drug issue.
33-year-old Stephen Hegarty of 58 Kilmore Road, Knocknaheeny, Cork, has secured alternative employment and is trying to put this behind him, Mr Buttimer said.
Judge Carroll said: “We all make mistakes. The thing is how we move on from them. He has support of his family. He has a new job. It is now a matter of moving on from here.”
Sergeant Pat Lyons outlined the background to the case: “Stephen Hegarty was employed as a postman operating a route on the southside of Cork city. In March 2021 he was suspended by An Post. On June 11 2021 gardaí called to his house at 58 Kilmore Road.
“He invited gardaí into his house. Six bags of post were discovered out the back of his house. It was mainly publicity post.”
All the post was subsequently delivered by An Post. The charge of failing to deliver post was contrary to the Post Office Act as amended by the Postal and Telecommunications Services Act and Larceny Act.

App?

