Student who sued UCD after alleged rape loses bid for costs order over anonymity

The student has appealed the dismissal of her action, claiming UCD failed to make adequate allowances to her following the alleged incident.
Student who sued UCD after alleged rape loses bid for costs order over anonymity

High Court Reporter

A medicine student who claimed she was raped by a fellow student has been refused an award of legal costs incurred in an application dealing with reporting restrictions in her High Court action against University College Dublin (UCD).

The student has appealed the dismissal of her action, claiming UCD failed to make adequate allowances to her following the alleged incident.

The appeal is scheduled to be heard by the three-judge Court of Appeal on July 21st.

In February, the student’s story entered the wider public domain after a report in UCD’s University Observer was raised in the Dáil by Solidarity TD Ruth Coppinger.

Coppinger’s statements and the report highlighted incidents where the woman’s “nude, bruised and unconscious” image, taken without her consent following an alleged violent rape, was shared with hundreds of college staff and students.

In light of increased publicity surrounding the case, UCD sought to vary an order made by the court anonymising the parties to the proceedings.

The university secured a variation on the order, which allowed for UCD to be identified and to comment on the case.

On Tuesday, Judge Marguerite Bolger refused to make an order awarding legal costs incurred by the student in responding to the university’s application for the variation.

The judge said that she did not consider the student was “entirely absolved” from responsibility for the circumstances that saw the university apply for the variation in the order.

The judge said she would make no order as to costs in respect of the university’s motion to vary the anonymity order.

Opposing the student’s application for costs, lawyers for the university submitted that she was in contact with Coppinger before her case being raised by the TD in the Dáil.

The university also submitted that she was in contact with media outlets in relation to the case.

The student had submitted, through her counsel, that the university’s own actions had brought about the perceived necessity for the variation in the anonymisation order.

She submitted that she was not responsible for the publication of the court’s judgment in the case, or increased publicity around the case.

If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, you can call the national 24-hour Rape Crisis Helpline at 1800-77 8888, access text service and webchat options at drcc.ie/services/helpline/ or visit Rape Crisis Help. In the case of an emergency, always dial 999/112. 

More in this section

Sulky racing on 'busy motorway' sparks calls for stronger animal welfare protections Sulky racing on 'busy motorway' sparks calls for stronger animal welfare protections
Criminal Courts of Justice Man told his partner’s ex he would decapitate him
Alcohol Drinking - Stock Planning given green light to convert former Ballsbridge Post Office into bar

Sponsored Content

AF The College Green Hotel Dublin March 2026 The College Green Hotel: A refined address in the heart of Dublin
SETU and Glassworks set to accelerate innovation SETU and Glassworks set to accelerate innovation
Driving Growth in Munster: How property finance is powering Cork’s future Driving Growth in Munster: How property finance is powering Cork’s future
Contact Us Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited

Add Echolive.ie to your home screen - easy access to Cork news, views, sport and more