Judge to consider admissibility of ‘decisive’ evidence in Soldier F prosecution

The former paratrooper has been accused of two murders during a series of shootings in Derry in 1972 known as Bloody Sunday.
Judge to consider admissibility of ‘decisive’ evidence in Soldier F prosecution

By Rebecca Black, PA

A judge has risen to consider whether “decisive” evidence in the prosecution of a former British paratrooper for two murders in Derry in 1972 is admissible.

It comes after three days of submissions at Belfast Crown Court following a hearsay application by the prosecution to admit a number of statements made by other soldiers on the ground during the shootings known as Bloody Sunday.

These statements include claims that their colleague fired shots at Glenfada Park North on January 30th, 1972, the day when members of the British army's Parachute Regiment shot dead 13 civilians in Derry following a civil rights march.

Soldier F, who cannot be identified, is accused of murdering James Wray and William McKinney.

Joe McKinney (second left), John McKinney (centre left), and Mickey McKinney (centre right), the brothers of William McKinney, one of the men killed on Bloody Sunday in Londonderry in 1972, arrive at Belfast Crown Court
Joe McKinney (second left), John McKinney (centre left), and Mickey McKinney (centre right), the brothers of William McKinney, one of the men killed on Bloody Sunday in Derry in 1972, arrive at Belfast Crown Court. Photo: Liam McBurney/PA

He is also charged with five attempted murders during the incident in Derry’s Bogside area, namely of Joseph Friel, Michael Quinn, Joe Mahon, Patrick O’Donnell and a person unknown.

He has pleaded not guilty to the seven counts.

Prosecution barrister Louis Mably KC has argued that statements given by Soldiers G and H to the Royal Military Police (RMP) on the night of the shootings, and to the Widgery Tribunal in 1972, is the only evidence “capable of proving” Soldier F fired his rifle at civilians in Glenfada Park North.

Defence barrister Mark Mulholland KC, acting for Soldier F, described the statements as a “house of cards”, claiming the contents are “contradictory, unreliable and inadmissible”.

“It is a house of cards that seems to evolve from a starting point of assumptions wrongly made to mistakes, and at the very worst mendacity,” he told the court.

He also said the court is “hamstrung” by the lack of surviving records around the statements and inability to cross-examine soldier G, who is deceased, and H, who has indicated he will invoke his right against self-incrimination if summoned to attend the trial.

Judge Patrick Lynch thanked the prosecution and defence for their oral and written submissions, and said he intended to deliver a ruling on the applications next Wednesday morning.

The trial opened on Monday and heard statements of a number of people present at the shootings, including former Stormont MP Ivan Cooper, who had organised the preceding civil rights march through Derry.

Soldier F is attending court each day of the non-jury trial, behind a curtain to protect his anonymity, while members of the Wray and McKinney families and supporters watch on from the public gallery.

Loyalist activist Jamie Bryson smiles at the camera
A letter written to the judge by loyalist activist Jamie Bryson has been passed to the Director of Public Prosecutions (Stefan Rousseau/PA)

Veterans Commissioner for Northern Ireland David Johnstone has been observing the case while supporters of Soldier F gather outside the court.

Police have also maintained a presence on each day of the trial.

Meanwhile, a letter written to the judge by loyalist activist Jamie Bryson has been passed to the Director of Public Prosecutions.

It came after Judge Lynch raised concerns around a social media post by Mr Bryson on Thursday.

He said of that post that had it been a jury trial as opposed to judge-only, there may have been an application to discharge the jury.

But he said, given that he was the judge of the facts, the views expressed by Mr Bryson about the case in the post would not present a risk of serious prejudice, adding Mr Bryson’s views were of “total indifference as far as this court is concerned”.

At the start of Friday’s hearing, Judge Lynch said a letter from Mr Bryson had been forwarded to him, but he had deleted it without reading it, and even also deleted it from his deleted folder.

He described the move as “entirely inappropriate” that anyone would attempt to contact a judge mid-trial, adding that Mr Bryson, who has a law degree, “should know about its impropriety”.

The judge said not knowing what was said in the letter, it “does not have any hearing on my capacity to deal with this case”.

He asked that the prosecution pass the letter to the director of the Public Prosecution Service for possible onward transmission to the Attorney General to consider whether there was any contempt of court.

More in this section

Michael Healy-Rae nominates Maria Steen for presidential election Michael Healy-Rae nominates Maria Steen for presidential election
Paul Costelloe Catwalk - London Fashion Week Paul Costelloe brings the Sixties Beverly Hills Barbie to the runway
Take That Host Special Screening Of The Circus Live DVD Take That to return to Dublin with 'The Circus Live' at Aviva Stadium next summer

Sponsored Content

St Patrick's College - New subjects and new facilities for 2025 St Patrick's College - New subjects and new facilities for 2025
Ashton School invites you to an open day event  Ashton School invites you to an open day event 
Rockwell College – 160 years of excellence Rockwell College – 160 years of excellence
Contact Us Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited

Add Echolive.ie to your home screen - easy access to Cork news, views, sport and more