Journalist 'quite certain' John Waters was referring to Kitty Holland in speech, defamation trial hears

The award-winning Irish Times journalist is suing her former colleague, John Waters (pictured) for damages of up to €75,000 for defamation of character. Photo: Collins
Journalist 'quite certain' John Waters was referring to Kitty Holland in speech, defamation trial hears

Ray Managh

Journalist Justine McCarthy told a judge on Thursday that as soon as she heard John Waters’ alleged defamatory speech to a political conference in 2017 about the death of Savita Halappanavar she was quite certain he was referring to Irish Times reporter Kitty Holland.

Holland, who won awards for scooping all of her national colleagues on a story that went around the world, is suing Waters for up to €75,000 damages for defamation of character. She claims that, although not specifically naming her in an address to a Renua Ireland conference, he was referring to her when he allegedly accused a journalist of lying.

McCarthy told Judge John O’Connor she had been tipped off about Waters’ address to the conference and watched it on Facebook. She told barrister Shane English, counsel for Holland, that her initial reaction was that the journalist was Kitty Holland.

“Once I heard the words I was quite certain it was a reference to Ms Holland who had just won Journalist of the Year,” Ms McCarthy said. She said she had contacted Holland who later confirmed she was suing Waters for libel.

Ms McCarthy said every journalist in Dublin had associated Kitty Holland with the Savita Halapanavar story.

The Circuit Civil Court has already heard that Holland, by suing him, was calling Waters, of Sandycove, Dublin, “a bare faced liar”.

Holland, a journalist of almost 30 years, of Ranelagh, Dublin, on Thursday told Feargal Kavanagh SC, counsel for Waters, she did not accept his explanation in a letter to her solicitors that he had been expressing his honestly held beliefs.

She described the letter, which runs to more than 100 pages, as “quite an assault…on me and The Irish Times.”

Andrew Walker SC, who appeared with Mr English and Lavelle Solicitors for Holland, told Judge O’Connor that Mr Kavanagh, in opening several pages of the letter to the court had not referred to its penultimate sentence which stated: “…in the event that it goes to a full hearing…I will take the opportunity offered to demonstrate how, with the carefully-orchestrated assistance of the Irish Times, the unforeseeable, appalling and saddening death of a young Indian woman in 2012 was cynically used to assist in the nefarious enterprise of bringing abortion into Ireland six years later.”

Holland spent more than three hours on Thursday under cross-examination by Mr Kavanagh, who appeared with barristers Greg Murphy and Conor Rubaclava and Brendan Maloney Solicitors for Mr Waters.

Waters denies all of Holland’s claims.

The trial, set down for four days, will resume on Monday morning.

More in this section

Dublin Fire Brigade stock Fire still burning on Slievenamon as cause may never be known
Keep ‘public accountability’ in mind on anonymity bids, Omagh bomb inquiry urged Keep ‘public accountability’ in mind on anonymity bids, Omagh bomb inquiry urged
What the papers say: Tuesday's front pages What the papers say: Tuesday's front pages

Sponsored Content

"My master's at UL taught me that structured learning and a demanding career can coexist" "My master's at UL taught me that structured learning and a demanding career can coexist"
Three days of steam, music and heritage at the 62nd National Steam Rally Three days of steam, music and heritage at the 62nd National Steam Rally
How 50 years of innovation and investment have fuelled Bord Gáis Energy – and empowered Cork How 50 years of innovation and investment have fuelled Bord Gáis Energy – and empowered Cork
Contact Us Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited

Add Echolive.ie to your home screen - easy access to Cork news, views, sport and more