Johnson: Northern Ireland Protocol can work, but in a different way

The British prime minister was challenged on what steps the UK government would take to deliver changes to the contentious post-Brexit trading arrangements.
Johnson: Northern Ireland Protocol can work, but in a different way

By David Young, Richard Wheeler and Martina Betteto, PA

Brexit’s Northern Ireland Protocol can be worked in a different way, the British prime minister has insisted.

Boris Johnson said there remained a need to convince the EU to agree to changes to how the contentious post-Brexit Irish Sea trading arrangements operate.

Commenting during prime minister’s questions at Westminster, Mr Johnson reiterated his threat to suspend elements of the protocol – by triggering the Article 16 mechanism – if an agreed resolution is not arrived at.

Invoking Article 16 would not axe the protocol, but rather instigate another negotiation process over its operation.

Mr Johnson’s remarks in response to a question from DUP leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson come as UK and EU officials continue technical discussions aimed at finding solutions to issues created by the new economic border in the Irish Sea.

The Northern Ireland Protocol requires new checks on goods moving from GB to NI (PA)

Both sides are trying to reach agreement that would reduce customs paperwork and the numbers of checks required on goods moving from Britain to Northern Ireland and ensure a continued free flow of medicines across the Irish Sea.

While the UK also wants to see the removal of a protocol oversight role for the European Court of Justice, the EU has refused to countenance such a move.

The UK government has repeatedly warned that it will trigger Article 16 if progress is not made – however there is mounting concern among some unionists in Northern Ireland that Mr Johnson has yet to follow through with that threat.

Unionists and loyalists are vehemently opposed to the protocol, arguing it has altered the constitutional position of Northern Ireland in the UK without their consent.

They claim it has undermined the principle of consent that was the fulcrum of the 1998 Good Friday peace agreement.

Nationalist and non-unionist parties in Northern Ireland take a different view. While they concede that operational issues with the protocol need to be addressed, they insist the arrangements can actually be beneficial for the region in the long term.

DUP leader Sir Jeffrey, who has threatened to collapse the power-sharing institutions at Stormont if major changes to the protocol are not secured, raised the issue again during question time on Wednesday.

He asked: “In view of the harm caused to political stability in Northern Ireland and to our economy by the Northern Ireland Protocol, noting the lack of progress in removing the Irish Sea border and recognising that unionist consent for the protocol is not forthcoming, what urgent steps does the prime minister and his government intend to take to honour his commitment to restore Northern Ireland’s place fully within the UK internal market and to safeguard the political institutions in Northern Ireland?”

DUP leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson MP raised the issue during prime minister’s questions (Liam McBurney/PA)

Mr Johnson noted that he and Sir Jeffrey had discussed the issue “extensively”.

“He knows that we share a view that the protocol is not working in the way that it needs to in order to guarantee the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement,” said the Tory leader.

“I don’t believe things need to be that way. I think it could be worked differently. And we want our EU friends and partners to understand that, and we will continue to work with them to get them to see things in the way that people on both sides of the Irish Sea see them. But, in the meantime, Mr Speaker, we do not remove the possibility of invoking Article 16 to protect trade between Great Britain and Northern Ireland.”

Afterwards, Mr Donaldson made clear that the sustainability of the political institutions in Northern Ireland were at stake if the Irish Sea border was not removed.

“If the prime minister fails to act to safeguard the political institutions, then it will fall to my party to take all steps necessary to bring this issue to a head,” he said.

Earlier, Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis was also challenged on the UK government’s stance on Article 16.

Addressing the Commons, Mr Lewis insisted the “ideal solution” would be to reach an agreement with the EU, but said the UK remains prepared to suspend parts of the agreement.

On Article 16, he added: “We’re very clear we don’t rule that out.

“If we have to use Article 16 we will, but we are in negotiations with the European Union and the ideal solution for us would be to come to an agreement with the European Union.

“But it’s got to be one that delivers on the needs of the people of Northern Ireland.”

Conservative MP Mark Francois claimed Mr Lewis “keeps threatening to invoke Article 16, but he never quite gets round to doing it”.

The MP for Rayleigh and Wickford added: “There’s a pattern of behaviour, here. The Secretary of State talks a great game, but he never plays one.”

Mr Lewis responded: “Article 16 is not the solution in itself, it’s the start of the process.”

He went on: “It is a reality that if we are not able to secure that agreement with the EU, the EU are not able to move in a way that delivers for Northern Ireland, that we do not take anything off the table.”

More in this section

Sponsored Content

Add to your home screen - easy access to Cork news, views, sport and more